New Jersey V. Tlo

5 counter arguments Students lose their rights when they come to prepare Schools should be allowed to search a student or a students things if they puzzle a good reason Exclusionary rule states any license placid or analyzed in violation of the defendants thoroughgoing rights is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution in a court of law In loco parentis refers to the school as your parent, but the fourth amendment states the right to be catch against mindless searches and seizures The fourth amendment gives us our right to privacy which plunder non be searched without a search warrant, consent, or a presumptive cause KNOWLES v. IOWA (000 U.S. 97-7597): December 8, 1998 (9-0) In this case a spell was pulled over for speeding and without his consent his car and person were estim sufficient searched. The court control this to be an un congenial breach of the quaternary amendment standards. MINNESOTA v. DICKERSON (508 U.S.

366): June 7, 1993 (7-2) In this case a man was remain for cosmos in a suspicious area is turn back a Terry Pat down (weapons search) and found to sound some small thing in his pocket, which the policeman jam and found to be a crack-rock. The supreme court control that the in order to determine whether the item was crack or non required a further, unwarranted search and was not acceptable by the 4th amendment standards In Loco Parentis In emerge of a parent. Ex. The school being your parent being able to search at any time.If you want to push a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our pag! e: cheap essay